Skip to main content

About your Search

20121231
20121231
Search Results 0 to 8 of about 9 (some duplicates have been removed)
laws passed, they have their mosthorrible gun massacre. norway, some of the most strictest gun laws on the planet, and that got on the island and murdered all of their kids. we have to understand somhing new is happening. the guns have always been there. we're working hard to keephem out of the hands of kids, but there is something profoundly new. if we don't focus on that e completely miss the issue here. lou: what is that new -- that change that is overtaking us, our society that can lead to this kind -- >> a new phenomenon. lou: what is it? >> never there before. violence injury, particularly video games. the number one trade law enforcement. man-hours, contact our supply system anywhere you want to measure it. one of the leading trainer is a military. i have a best-selling video series were preparing individual citizens to be able to use deadly force at the moment of truth. and from all those perspectives, we know that simulations and visualization and mental rehearsal is absolutely essential to performance on the battlefield. the video games are providing the exact same thing
that you know, we are held to some limitations. in fact it is against the law, if at times i was to spend more money than i actually have. doesn't make any sense. adam: no, it would make you a politician. >> absolutely. absolutely. there is no skin in the game. yeah, granted i have accountability. i have accountability to clients, employees, to produce the best product and service that we possibly can. adam: sure. >> i don't think that is here. i don't think that is evidence. i think that we've got people coming and going. it will cause for great disruption and going to continue for years and years. adam: steve, let me ask you, when the president spoke mid-afternoon today, did he poke, take his finger and poke it in the eye of the republicans saying i beat you up and now i spit on you? seems like he was doing all he could to destroy whatever deal was on the table? >> i think there were two problems what he said. one was tone. the other was substance. if you look at the tone, this is a president, who at least in theory wanted to avert this fiscal cliff. i've been saying all along there are
this, if you don't change your gun laws to at least try to stop these relentless tidal waves of murderous carnage then you don't have to worry about deporting me. i'll have my take on piers morgan in our next hour or so. clearly, i've got a dog in this hunt, i am english, i'm an immigrant, et cetera, et cetera, and i've got a strong opinion on pierce morgan. let's go back to kelly jane, what do you think of piers, my good fellow. >> is anybody crying about this, is anybody worried that piers morgan is it going to leave? you know, i hate to be -- i hate to be snarky, but i think that people were very surprised when he got that slot after larry king in the first place and his show has been most successful in giving people things to laugh at the day after. stuart: ooh, that was good, kelly jane. that was really nasty. . [laughter] thank you very much indeed. >> i love the english, i love the english so i'm happy to have more of them in the states, i just think that they might want to read a little about the history of the country to which they're going to, which you obviously ha
up by law. every american paycheck will get considerably smaller. that would be the wrong thing to do. gerri: no kidding. we have been telling you that for weeks. democrats and republicans alike should rename their parties the procrastination party. that is because like a lot of college freshman, they left their work until the last minute. including the 800 billion-dollar fiscal cliff that we have been talking about. a hundred billion dollars it hasn' happened yet. it's not like the deadline comes as a surprise to anybody at all, the least of all congress. they were the ones who extended the bush tax cuts. originally passed back in 20,122,010 and 2012. for two years now, they have known the issue is looming and they chose to do nothing about it at all. but that is not the only thing that this lame-duck congress has to do for the end of the year. e farm bill passed last summer to help farmers hit by the drought has to be extended. into the next year, it must pass. if they do nothing, a gallon of milk goup $6 a gallon. it sure isn't going to help consumers. then there are restrictions o
an stupid, you die. >> they don't have rule of law? >>guest: they don't have rule ofaw or access to credit and they are locked in a vcious circle poverty. it takes a small investmt to get them out of that. to me it shows the aptitude of people. when a young couple decide to grab if the kingdom and to have two children, they invest in the children and they take off. we have two-child families from here and onward. the world is governed from that. it is not the big corporations or banks tat run the economy, it is t young couple who decide to work. when they are educated with wealth they . >> are helpful. this fantastic invtment in vaccinations that helps so do you not have a d who is physically handicapped for life, thatrags the family down. the way that government sources are used is crucial. there are some things like advancement and research and primary school we need the government money but it has to be controlled. >> thank you, sir. next, you want to live to be 150? my next guest says the frst rson to do so my have already been born. itmight be you. do you want to live to be 150? i don
of tax laws at the end of last year which drove it down to $5 a share. obviously this year anybody who's bought it in the last year has had some pretty good gains. this stock was $18 just a couple of years ago and can certainly get back into the mid to upper teens. what it needs to get through is a better capital markets environment, so we hope that all these people in washington are listening and let the market get back to normal business. it also needs to get through a lot of mortgage headaches, and there's still a lot of them out there -- liz: and, frankly, anton, regulatory overhang. >> exactly. liz: a lot of capital requirements, for example, which may squeeze margins. >> well, i think that's all sort of been out there. the banking industry is better capitalized than it's ever been in its entire history. most banks, one would argue, have too much capital. and, you're right, it does squeeze margins. that being said, it makes them a lot safer. and many people have talked about banks being utility-like and return to the shareholders through dividends and buybacks, and i think you're
does that send to the law makers? >> i think that sends a very clear message that the voters basically said we want divided government. we'll let president obama have a second term but we want the republicans who control the house and that's where tax, tax legislation originates, to basically hold the line on taxes. so i feel like the elector rate made it clear that republicans you're job to protect us from economy-strangling tags increases. this is very quick path for the republicans back into the minority in 2014. ashley: is all this a big forerunner to a big debate over the debt ceiling? >> interesting that you bring up the debt ceiling. i think that's what the republicans can do. if they basically walk away from a bad deal they have a lot more power going into 2013 in that, basically president obama is going to have to deal with them on the debt ceiling. why not negotiate from a position strength in 2013? any tax increases now are retroactive, rather than give in and basically do great harm to your brand in the near term in return for nothing? ashley: basically what lesson do we le
to the 2013 withholding since congress is still considering changes in the tax law. we continue to closely monitor the situation. we intend to issue guidance by the end of the year on appropriate withholding for 2013. december 301st. the end of the year. we are told by officials that, in fact, there will be guidance from the treasury. what i'm sensing is there kind of waiting to see what comes out of these negotiations later today before they issued this guidance to employers. cheryl: secretary tim geithner has been involved off and on in the fiscal cliff discussions and talks. you keep hearing the word retroactive. because shockingly enough, if congress can't figure something out today, who would think that what happened. that would mean that this will get pushed down to later in the weekend it would come back. congress kicks in, things become retroactive. this is d.c. don't they have the power computer, to go home and come back and figure this out? >> they do. there are two approaches going forward from today. one is maybe have a framework today and pass it next week. then teams the tax
Search Results 0 to 8 of about 9 (some duplicates have been removed)